All Cannabis Legislation
SF 2923
🟡 In Committee
Senate

Hempcrete Building Codes

Would require the state to create official building code rules for hempcrete and straw bale construction, opening the door for these sustainable building materials to be used more widely in Minnesota.

Last updated: Mar 24, 2025 ·  94th Legislature, 2025-2026 Session

Plain-English Overview

SF2923 steps outside the usual cannabis policy debates and into the world of building materials. Introduced by Senator Ann Johnson Stewart, the bill would require Minnesota's Department of Labor and Industry to develop official building code rules for two sustainable construction materials: hempcrete and straw bale. Hempcrete is a mixture of hemp fibers (the woody core of the hemp plant, called the hurd) combined with a lime-based binder. It creates lightweight, insulating wall material that is fire-resistant, mold-resistant, and actually absorbs carbon dioxide over its lifetime, making it carbon-negative.

Right now, building with hempcrete or straw bale in Minnesota is technically possible but practically difficult. Without specific building code provisions, builders must go through an expensive and time-consuming alternative materials approval process for each project. That means hiring engineers, paying for extra inspections, and navigating bureaucratic uncertainty. This bill would fix that by creating a clear set of rules that builders can follow, just like the rules that already exist for wood framing, concrete, and steel.

The bill represents an intersection of cannabis policy and climate policy. Hemp is a rapidly renewable crop that Minnesota farmers are increasingly growing. Using hemp-based building materials creates a new market for agricultural hemp, supports rural economies, and addresses climate goals by replacing carbon-intensive materials like concrete. Straw bale construction - which uses agricultural waste from grain production - offers similar benefits. Both materials have been used for decades in other countries and states, but the lack of building codes has been the biggest barrier to wider adoption.

Key Dates

Introduced

Mar 24, 2025

Last Action

Mar 24, 2025

Committee Deadline

Mar/Apr 2026

Session Ends

May 2026

Key Provisions

  • Requires the Department of Labor and Industry to develop building code rules for hempcrete construction
  • Requires building code rules for straw bale construction
  • Establishes a rulemaking process with input from builders, engineers, and hemp industry stakeholders
  • Creates a clear regulatory pathway so builders do not need special alternative materials permits for every project

Who Wants What

Supporters Say

  • +Hempcrete is carbon-negative, fire-resistant, and highly insulating - Minnesota should make it easier to build with materials that fight climate change
  • +Farmers need new markets for hemp fiber, and hempcrete construction creates significant demand for a crop that Minnesota growers are already producing
  • +The current alternative materials process is so expensive and uncertain that it effectively blocks innovation in sustainable building - clear codes remove that barrier

Opponents Say

  • -Hempcrete and straw bale are still relatively uncommon in commercial construction, and there is limited long-term performance data for Minnesota's harsh freeze-thaw climate
  • -Developing new building codes takes time and resources from the Department of Labor and Industry, which already faces a backlog of code updates
  • -Some in the conventional building industry worry that promoting alternative materials could complicate construction standards and increase confusion for inspectors

Impact Analysis

🏠

Consumers & Public

Homeowners and commercial property owners would gain access to sustainable building options without the current costly approval headaches. Hempcrete walls provide excellent insulation that can reduce heating and cooling costs. However, hempcrete construction may initially cost more than conventional methods until the market matures and more contractors gain experience.

🏪

Businesses

Hemp farmers gain a new market for hemp hurd (the woody fiber) that is currently an underused byproduct. Builders who specialize in sustainable construction would see new opportunities. Hempcrete manufacturers could invest in Minnesota production facilities once the code barrier is removed. Conventional building material suppliers could face modest competition over time.

💰

Taxpayers

The rulemaking process has a modest cost to the Department of Labor and Industry, likely in the range of hundreds of thousands of dollars over several years. However, broader adoption of sustainable building materials could reduce long-term energy costs for public buildings and support state climate goals.

⚖️

Legal & Enforcement

Once building codes are established, local building inspectors would need training on hempcrete and straw bale standards. The codes would provide legal certainty for builders, insurers, and mortgage lenders who currently face uncertainty about these materials.

Historical Context

Several states have already made progress on hempcrete building codes. In 2022, the International Code Council approved hempcrete for inclusion in the International Residential Code appendix, a major milestone. States like Texas and North Carolina have seen hempcrete building projects. France has used hempcrete in construction for over 20 years, and the United Kingdom has well-established standards. Straw bale construction has been code-approved in several states including California, Oregon, and Nebraska for years. Minnesota would be joining an accelerating national trend toward recognizing these sustainable materials in building codes.

Legislative Timeline

Introduction Committee Floor / Amendment Passed / Signed Failed / Vetoed
  1. Senate

    Referred to Labor

    Latest statusWatch/listen to committee hearing
  2. Senate

    Introduction and first reading

Likely next steps

  1. TBD

    Committee hearing and amendment process

  2. TBD

    Committee vote - move to full chamber

  3. TBD

    Floor debate and chamber vote

  4. TBD

    Conference committee (if both chambers pass different versions)

  5. TBD

    Governor signature or veto

Sponsors

D

Ann Johnson Stewart

Author - Democrat

Frequently Asked Questions

Get Involved

This bill is still working through the legislature. Here is how you can make your voice heard.

Contact Your Rep

Find and contact your Minnesota legislators about this bill.

Find Your Legislators

Read the Bill

Read the official bill text on the MN Revisor website.

Official Bill Text

Stay Updated

Subscribe to the MN Cannabis Hub newsletter for bill updates.

Subscribe for Updates

Share This Page

Help others follow this bill by sharing this page.

Research This Bill With AI

Use AI assistants to get plain-English breakdowns of this bill. Each button opens a pre-written research prompt - our site URL is included so AI citations point back to MN Cannabis Hub.

G
Ask ChatGPT

Get a simple explanation of what this bill does and who it affects.

Ask ChatGPT
P
Ask Perplexity

Research supporters, opponents, and real-world effects with sources cited.

Ask Perplexity
C
Ask Claude

Deep analysis: fiscal impact, comparisons to other states, arguments for and against.

View the prompts being sent

ChatGPT prompt:

Summarize Minnesota bill SF2923 "Hempcrete Building Codes" and its impact on citizens, businesses, and the cannabis industry. Explain it like I'm 10 years old. Use https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/SF2923 as a reference source.

Perplexity prompt:

What is Minnesota bill SF2923 "Hempcrete Building Codes"? What does it do, who supports and opposes it, and how will it affect Minnesota cannabis consumers and businesses? Cite https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/SF2923

Claude prompt (copy and paste):

Analyze Minnesota cannabis bill SF2923 "Hempcrete Building Codes". Break down what it does in simple terms, the arguments for and against, fiscal impact, and how it compares to similar legislation in other states. Reference: https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/SF2923